With people continuing to want the latest trends, newest products and biggest brand names as soon as possible, and dropping them just as quickly, the idea of rental clothing has been predicted to overtake the fast fashion industry within 10 years. But how does renting a product compete with ownership?
While rental fashion seems like the answer to all our fast fashion problems – overproduction, waste, impulse buys and unethical practises, to name a few – I can’t help but wonder how many people will sacrifice the gratification of actually owning that coveted designer piece they worked hard to buy. This is not to say I don’t think rental clothing isn’t a good idea. If it works it would be a revolutionary way of changing our shopping habits and ending the fast fashion cycle we seem to be stuck in. But how will it work?

In my opinion I think rental fashion works best with wear-once clothing, such as designer dresses and suits for special occasions. I also think it would work very well with accessories, such as statement necklaces and other expensive jewellery for formal events. On the other hand I don’t think rental fashion would work well high-street clothing, as people can easily buy the latest thing and not have to worry about returning the item or what to do if it gets damaged in day-to-day life. That being said, I think there is potential for rental children’s clothes as a lot of the time parents buy their child clothing only for them to grow out of it within the coming months. Rather than buy their child an expensive jacket or shoes for a one-time event, they could rent the outfit and return it – no money wasted on a product that will become useless in a few months time.
I believe that if rental fashion became more suitable for high-street and everyday clothing it could really break the fast-fashion cycle, but this is unlikely as high-street clothing is susceptible to wear and tear, and most people have staple items in their wardrobe they wear very often, like their go-to jeans and their work wear. If people bought less clothes, but clothes of a higher-quality that last longer, they could look into renting outfits that wouldn’t be so easily damaged – and if they are, they would be worth fixing, unlike high street clothes which are often thrown out and replaced when they become torn or stained.
Clothing often has sentimental value, such as wedding dresses which are available to rent but also buy. I think many people would want to hold onto such an important dress, either to pass it down to their daughter or keep for the memories. It is for these reasons I disagree that rental will overtake the fast fashion industry within the next 10 years – I just don’t think that wear-once clothing will fit into everyday wardrobes, and people will be reluctant to give up ownership of brand names or sentimental pieces.





